DevConsensus

↑↓ not needed — type and press Enter. ⌘K / Ctrl K to open anywhere.

Get the report →
Head-to-head · Nov 2025 – Nov 2026

Cursor vs Kilo Code: what 1 developers chose.

797 opinions. 1 developers named a direct preference: Kilo Code 1–0. Approval is 55% vs 63%.

797 opinions621 developersNov 2025 – Nov 2026Methodology
Cursor
55%
766 opinions · 600 developers
90 days: 53%
VS
Kilo Code
63%
31 opinions · 21 developers
90 days: –
Our call

If you want UX, choose Cursor. If you want customization, choose Kilo Code. The 1–0 direct split is not a landslide; it is a difference in working style.

Choose Cursor if you…

  • Want the tool with far more firsthand reports (583)
  • Care most about speed (44 positive, 8 negative) and UX (101 to 59)
  • Need one interface that hosts several model providers

Choose Kilo Code if you…

  • Want better pricing and more model options, per the one direct comparison
  • Prefer an open-source VS Code extension over a standalone IDE
  • Value customization, which scored 4 positive and 0 negative
Where each wins

UX for Cursor. Customization for Kilo Code.

Net sentiment per topic: praise minus complaints, as a share of mentions. Positive means more praise than complaints. Hover a dot for the raw counts.

CursorKilo Code
TopicMore complaints ← → More praiseNet
UX 160 / 3 mentions
+26 / +33
Customization 30 / 4 mentions
+40 / +100
Cost & pricing 118 / 5 mentions
−2 / +60
Reliability 72 / 5 mentions
−61 / −20
Autonomy 52 / 5 mentions
+15 / −20
−100−500+50+100

Net sentiment = praise minus complaints, as a share of each tool's mentions. The dot lanes are only for readability; position is the score.

View data table
TopicCursorKilo CodeMentions
UX+26+33160 / 3
Customization+40+10030 / 4
Cost & pricing-2+60118 / 5
Reliability-61-2072 / 5
Autonomy+15-2052 / 5
Why developers switched

The same decision, from both sides.

Paraphrased from comments where a developer named a preference or described a switch. Each links to the original.

Picked Cursor 0 developers

No explicit switches recorded.

Picked Kilo Code 1 developers

Said Kilo Code had better pricing and more model options, and had fully replaced Cursor with no regrets.

HN comment · Feb 4, 2026Read on HN ↗
Side by side

The numbers.

MetricCursorKilo Code
Approval55%63%
Last 90 days53%–
Opinions76631
Developers60021
First-hand opinions58320
Direct picks01
TypeAI IDEIDE extension
Made byAnysphereOpen source
WebsiteVisit ↗Visit ↗
Keep comparing

Related matchups.

All 136 comparisons →
VS

Claude Code vs Cursor

61–42 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

54%103 direct picks55%
Read the comparison →
VS

OpenAI Codex vs Cursor

21–7 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

69%28 direct picks55%
Read the comparison →
VS

Cursor vs Zed

14–7 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

55%21 direct picks59%
Read the comparison →
Methodology

How to read this comparison.

Approval is the positive share of opinions that took a side, with the rank based on the lower bound of a 90% confidence interval. Direct picks count comments where a developer explicitly preferred one tool or described switching. Small samples are noisier; check the opinion counts.

Read the full method →