DevConsensus

↑↓ not needed — type and press Enter. ⌘K / Ctrl K to open anywhere.

Get the report →
Head-to-head · Nov 2025 – Nov 2026

Cursor vs Kiro: what 1 developers chose.

804 opinions. 1 developers named a direct preference: Cursor 1–0. Approval is 55% vs 59%.

804 opinions630 developersNov 2025 – Nov 2026Methodology
Cursor
55%
766 opinions · 600 developers
90 days: 53%
VS
Kiro
59%
38 opinions · 30 developers
90 days: –
Our call

Cursor wins the direct preference 1–0, but both tools score best on the same topic. Use the decision cards below to choose on workflow.

Choose Cursor if you…

  • Want the most-reviewed option, with 766 opinions from 600 authors
  • Care most about UX (101 positive, 59 negative) and speed (44 to 8)
  • Can live with reliability (14 positive, 58 negative) and cost (58 to 60) complaints

Choose Kiro if you…

  • Work in the AWS ecosystem and want spec-driven output
  • Are watching spend, with 3 positive cost mentions to 1 negative
  • Want strong autonomy signals, 4 positive and no negative
Where each wins

Cursor and Kiro: where each one wins.

Net sentiment per topic: praise minus complaints, as a share of mentions. Positive means more praise than complaints. Hover a dot for the raw counts.

CursorKiro
TopicMore complaints ← → More praiseNet
UX 160 / 11 mentions
+26 / +45
Cost & pricing 118 / 4 mentions
−2 / +50
Code quality 108 / 5 mentions
+9 / −20
Reliability 72 / 6 mentions
−61 / −33
Autonomy 52 / 4 mentions
+15 / +100
−100−500+50+100

Net sentiment = praise minus complaints, as a share of each tool's mentions. The dot lanes are only for readability; position is the score.

View data table
TopicCursorKiroMentions
UX+26+45160 / 11
Cost & pricing-2+50118 / 4
Code quality+9-20108 / 5
Reliability-61-3372 / 6
Autonomy+15+10052 / 4
Why developers switched

The same decision, from both sides.

Paraphrased from comments where a developer named a preference or described a switch. Each links to the original.

Picked Cursor 1 developers

Cursor beats Kiro and other direct rivals on speed, features and output quality, with a wide gap.

HN comment · Apr 22, 2026Read on HN ↗

Picked Kiro 0 developers

No explicit switches recorded.

Side by side

The numbers.

MetricCursorKiro
Approval55%59%
Last 90 days53%–
Opinions76638
Developers60030
First-hand opinions58326
Direct picks10
TypeAI IDEAI IDE
Made byAnysphereAWS
WebsiteVisit ↗Visit ↗
Keep comparing

Related matchups.

All 136 comparisons →
VS

Claude Code vs Cursor

61–42 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

54%103 direct picks55%
Read the comparison →
VS

OpenAI Codex vs Cursor

21–7 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

69%28 direct picks55%
Read the comparison →
VS

Cursor vs Zed

14–7 direct picks, and a clear difference in what developers optimise for.

55%21 direct picks59%
Read the comparison →
Methodology

How to read this comparison.

Approval is the positive share of opinions that took a side, with the rank based on the lower bound of a 90% confidence interval. Direct picks count comments where a developer explicitly preferred one tool or described switching. Small samples are noisier; check the opinion counts.

Read the full method →