Qwen 3 Coder: what 39 developers actually say.
39 Hacker News opinions from 35 developers, Nov 2025 – Nov 2026. 27 come from people who say they use it. Here is what they praise, what they complain about, and who switched.
The case for Qwen 3 Coder, in one paragraph.
Qwen 3 Coder earns 87% approval across 39 opinions. Developers praise its code quality.
Pick it if you
- Want a local model for boilerplate and autocomplete
- Care about privacy and running on your own hardware
- Want solid code quality at low or zero cost
Look elsewhere if you
- Need dependable tool calls when driving MCP tools
- Expect frontier-level quality from the 30B local build
- Plan to pick the 480B model over GLM 4.6
Where it wins and loses.
Mentions across 39 opinions. Bars are counts, not votes; a tool can be both praised and criticized on the same topic.
View data table
| Topic | Praise | Complaints | Mentions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code quality | 17 | 3 | 20 |
How opinion has moved.
Monthly approval, Nov 2025 – Jun 2026. Bars show opinion volume; low-volume months are still included but faded.
View data table
| Month | Approval | Opinions |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 81% | 8 |
| Jan 2026 | 86% | 7 |
| Feb 2026 | 100% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | 100% | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | 100% | 5 |
What developers say.
Summaries are paraphrased. Each links to the original Hacker News comment.
Praise
4 selectedQwen3-Coder 30B is more responsive and accurate for writing code than Qwen 3.6 in their tests.
Qwen 3 Coder clearly beats Qwen 3.6 for writing code, based on their own use on a server.
Runs Qwen3-coder:30b on an old GTX 1070 machine at zero cost and finds it useful for boilerplate.
Switched back to Qwen3-Coder on the older rig, preferring it over Qwen3.6.
Complaints
4 selectedQwen3-Coder 30B hallucinates tool calls when driving an MCP tool.
Calls Qwen3 Coder 30B underwhelming compared with frontier models for local use.
Quotes research finding Qwen3-Coder's code about 130% more vulnerable for a government customer.
The 480B Qwen 3 Coder variant is largely worse than the 355B GLM 4.6 model.
Questions developers ask.
Is Qwen 3 Coder worth it?
Is Qwen 3 Coder better than GLM 4.6?
Does Qwen 3 Coder work well for local use?
The data behind this page.
Developers give Qwen 3 Coder an 87% approval across 39 opinions from 35 authors, and 27 of those opinions are firsthand. Code quality carries the score at 17 positive mentions against 3 negative, with speed at 7 positive and 0 negative and local privacy at 6 positive and 0 negative. Cost draws 3 positive mentions and no complaints, and users report it useful for boilerplate and autocomplete on older hardware. Monthly approval held at 100% from February to July 2026, then fell to 0% on 2 opinions in October 2026.
Every number comes from public Hacker News comments collected through the HN Search API. A language model tagged each comment for sentiment, first-hand use, topic and switches; a human spot-checks samples. No vendor can pay for placement.
Get the monthly report
Which AI coding tools gained or lost developer approval on Hacker News, and why people switched. One email a month.