Qwen 3 Coder Next: what 48 developers actually say.

48 Hacker News opinions from 40 developers, Nov 2025 – Nov 2026. 39 come from people who say they use it. Here is what they praise, what they complain about, and who switched.

48 opinions40 developersNov 2025 – Nov 2026Methodology
Approval
72%
±10.7 at 90% confidence
Last 90 days
–
No recent data
Rank
#22
of 45 models · CI-adjusted
Opinions
48
39 first-hand
Developers
40
1.2 opinions each
The short version

The case for Qwen 3 Coder Next, in one paragraph.

Qwen 3 Coder Next earns 72% approval across 48 opinions. Developers praise its code quality.

Pick it if you

  • Want to run a coding model on your own hardware
  • Care about fast responses and local privacy
  • Need a cheap fallback for basic coding or agent work

Look elsewhere if you

  • Need reliable behavior in long sessions
  • Depend on strong tool calling and reasoning
  • Need top-end code quality and edge-case coverage

Where it wins and loses.

Mentions across 48 opinions. Bars are counts, not votes; a tool can be both praised and criticized on the same topic.

TopicComplaints ← → PraiseMentions
Speed 12 mentions
012
Code quality 20 mentions
713
PraiseComplaint
2 topics shown · sorted by net sentiment · source: 48 opinions
View data table
TopicPraiseComplaintsMentions
Speed12012
Code quality13720

How opinion has moved.

Monthly approval, Feb 2026 – Jul 2026. Bars show opinion volume; low-volume months are still included but faded.

96% Feb 202638% Jun 2026 low83% Jul 2026– last 90 days
0255075100APPROVAL72% all-time96%38% low83%Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26Jul '26
Monthly approval, 0–100. Bars show opinion volume. Months with fewer than 3 opinions are left out.
View data table
MonthApprovalOpinions
Feb 202696%14
Mar 202661%14
Apr 202657%7
May 202675%4
Jun 202638%4
Jul 202683%3

What developers say.

Summaries are paraphrased. Each links to the original Hacker News comment.

Praise

4 selected
Speed

Qwen 3 Coder Next responds in under a minute after warmup when run on a GPU.

HN comment · Jul 23, 2026Read on HN ↗
Cost & pricing

Runs Qwen3-Coder-Next locally on a 128GB desktop for just electricity cost; slower, but worth it.

HN comment · Jun 18, 2026Read on HN ↗
Speed

Qwen 3 Coder Next runs well locally at about 35 tokens per second for their team.

HN comment · May 15, 2026Read on HN ↗

Uses Qwen3-coder-next in OpenCode for everything and sees no need to switch models.

HN comment · May 12, 2026Read on HN ↗

Complaints

4 selected
Reliability

Qwen3 Coder Next kept looping while analyzing a decompiled app, possibly due to their prompt.

HN comment · Jun 15, 2026Read on HN ↗
Reliability

Qwen 3 Coder Next hallucinates on their local agentic tasks.

HN comment · Jun 14, 2026Read on HN ↗
Code quality

Does not find the 80B Qwen3 Coder Next much better at coding than the smaller model.

HN comment · Apr 23, 2026Read on HN ↗
Code quality

Qwen 3 Coder Next was not very successful for them after being recommended it.

HN comment · Mar 31, 2026Read on HN ↗

Questions developers ask.

Is Qwen 3 Coder Next worth it?
It earns 72% approval across 48 opinions. Speed and local use draw the clearest praise, while code quality is split and reliability is a weak spot. It fits local or low-cost coding work with those caveats.
Is Qwen 3 Coder Next better than Claude Code?
The data does not establish a clear winner. One developer preferred Claude Code and one preferred Qwen 3.5. One positive report rated it equal to Claude Code in that user's tests, while others found its tool use behind Claude and GPT models.
Can Qwen 3 Coder Next run locally?
Local use is its clearest strength, with 7 positive opinions and no negative ones. Reported speeds range from about 7 tokens per second on a 4090 to about 120 tokens per second on an M4 Max. One user reports that sessions near 60k tokens become unreliable.

The data behind this page.

Opinions on Qwen 3 Coder Next sit at 72% approval across 48 opinions from 40 authors, with 39 opinions firsthand. Speed is the strongest aspect at 12 positive and 0 negative, and local or private use adds 7 positive and 0 negative. Code quality is contested at 13 positive and 7 negative, while reliability is weak at 1 positive and 2 negative. Monthly approval has been volatile, from 38% in June to 83% in July, 50% in August, and 100% in October, but the final three months with data have only 3, 1, and 1 opinions.

Every number comes from public Hacker News comments collected through the HN Search API. A language model tagged each comment for sentiment, first-hand use, topic and switches; a human spot-checks samples. No vendor can pay for placement.

20,064 comments screened48 about Qwen 3 Coder Next39 first-hand

Read the full methodology →