Roo Code: what 17 developers actually say.
17 Hacker News opinions from 9 developers, Nov 2025 – Nov 2026. 15 come from people who say they use it. Here is what they praise, what they complain about, and who switched.
The case for Roo Code, in one paragraph.
Roo Code earns 79% approval across 17 opinions. Developers are divided on it.
Pick it if you
- Want to customize prompts and tools (3 positive mentions, no negatives)
- Prefer agent modes over plain plan and act
- Want to switch model providers mid-task and keep your setup
Look elsewhere if you
- Need a project with active maintenance; two comments call it retired
- Want a broad VS Code experience; one user found it limited and frustrating
- Apply complex diffs with weaker models; one user reported looping
Where it wins and loses.
Mentions across 17 opinions. Bars are counts, not votes; a tool can be both praised and criticized on the same topic.
View data table
| Topic | Praise | Complaints | Mentions |
|---|
How opinion has moved.
Monthly approval, Jan 2026 – Apr 2026. Bars show opinion volume; low-volume months are still included but faded.
Not enough monthly data for a trend yet.
What developers say.
Summaries are paraphrased. Each links to the original Hacker News comment.
Praise
4 selectedThey personally liked Roo Code more than Kilo Code, though Roo Code was retired.
Liked Roo Code's UI/UX a lot, though the project has been retired.
They liked Roo Code more than Cline and Kilo Code in VS Code, and regrets its loss.
Roo Code was somewhat better than Cline because it offered more customization of prompts and tools.
Complaints
3 selectedFinds Roo Code's VS Code experience extremely limited and frustrating.
Roo Code can't guide models well enough, so they loop when applying complex diffs.
Roo Code has major token-utilization problems.
Questions developers ask.
Is Roo Code worth it?
Is Roo Code better than Cline?
Does Roo Code work well in VS Code?
The data behind this page.
Developers give Roo Code 79% approval across 17 opinions from 9 authors, and 15 of those opinions are firsthand. Customization is the clearest strength, with 3 positive mentions and no negatives. UX and reliability each draw 2 positive and 1 negative mention. Monthly approval swung from 25% in December 2025 to 100% in January 2026 and 60% on 5 opinions in April 2026, and two comments describe the project as retired.
Every number comes from public Hacker News comments collected through the HN Search API. A language model tagged each comment for sentiment, first-hand use, topic and switches; a human spot-checks samples. No vendor can pay for placement.
Get the monthly report
Which AI coding tools gained or lost developer approval on Hacker News, and why people switched. One email a month.